Diffraction tomography for biomedical imaging with dif fuse photon density waves: errata.

0146 In our recent Letter there appeared several errors in printing. On p. 573, the title should read as follows: ‘‘Diffraction tomography for biomedical imaging with diffuse-photon density waves.’’ Notice that it is biomedical not biochemical. On p. 573, line 6 in the second paragraph in the left-hand-side column, ‘‘In this Letter present a . . .’’ should read as ‘‘In this Letter we present a . . . .’’ On p. 573, line 4 in the third paragraph in the left-hand-side column, ‘‘(DDPW)’’ should read as ‘‘(DPDW).’’ On p. 573, lines 3–5 below Eq. (1) in the righthand-side column, ‘‘Tabsfr, U0sr, rs, vdg ­ fdmasrdvy D0gU0sr, rs, vd for absorbing objects’’ should read as ‘‘Tabsfr, U0sr, rs, vdg ­ f2dmasrdvyD0gU0sr,rs, vd for absorbing objects.’’ Notice the minus sign on the right-hand-side of this equation. On p. 573, lines 5–6 below Eq. (1) in the right-hand-side column, ‘‘Tscattfr, U0sr, rs, vdg ­ fdmssrd3Dokoyvd 2 = lnsdm0 s 1 m0 sodg ? =Uosr, rs, vd for scattering objects’’ should read as Tscattfr, U0sr, rs, vdg ­ fdm0 ssrd3DokoyvgU0sr, rs, vd 2 = lnsdm0 s 1 m0 sod ? =Uosr, rs, vd for scattering objects.’’ Notice U0sr, rs, vd is directly associated with the first term on the right-hand-side of the equation. On p. 574, the exponential term on the lefthand-side of Eq. (4) ‘‘exps2mzj d’’ should read as ‘‘exps2imzj d.’’